home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: info.spt.net.cn!usenet
- From: Xu Yifeng <jafd@public.sta.net.cn>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Borland vs MSFT DLL size
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 13:58:26 -0800
- Organization: ZheJiang Securities Co.Ltd
- Message-ID: <30F97C82.108C@public.sta.net.cn>
- References: <4d70f1$ods@ns2.ptd.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts2-6.sta.net.cn
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win16; I)
-
- veronica catrombon wrote:
-
- /*
- I have a DLL that is 65K bytes using MSFT Visual C++,
- and is 287K using Borland 4.0. Source code is the
- same and they both work OK. I've tried many ways
- to shrink the DLL coming out of the Borland compiler,
- but can't come close to the 65K of Visual C++.
- The only obvious thing is that I can't get the
- standard Libraries to link dynamically (only the
- static option works) under the Linker options.
- Any clues as to how to get the Borland version to
- 65K like the Visual C++ version? Thanks in advance.
- */
-
-
- Hello, I don't have Borland C++ 4.0, but I have Borland
- C++ 4.5, I know in Borland C++ 4.5, all library can be
- DLL, also include the Running-Time library, You maybe
- try to use Borland C++ 4.5.
-
- Best wish.
-